Rosa Rubicondior: Refuting the Arguments For God

Post a Comment

Obscene, obnoxious, or preaching messages will be removed. Please provide a citation for any substantive claim and remember that, whilst you are fully entitiled to your opinion, you are not entitled to have it regarded as established fact needing no further supporting evidence.

via rosarubicondior.blogspot.com

Rosa nails these supercilious arguments for the woo that they are! Theists haven't advanced their woo since the times of Carneades and Hume, just more verbiage! Here as Victor Stenger notes where mountains of evidence should be there for Hie existence and none is and in accordance with Charles Moore;s auto-epistemic rule, absence of evidence is indeed evidence of absence.
God is no more a something than a square circle or a perpetual motion machine!
However, others might disagree.
What are your comments on these arguments and any others? Let's have a spirited conversation here!